deviant art

Deviant Login Shop  Join deviantART for FREE Take the Tour
[x]
more ▶

More from *fraterchaos

Featured in Groups:

Details

February 25
Sta.sh Writer
Link
Thumb

Statistics

Comments: 35
Favourites: 11 [who?]

Views: 85 (0 today)
[x]
In 1905, Albert Einstein revolutionized our understanding of space and time when he published his "Special Theory of Relativity" with it's well known axiom E=mc2. While few truly have a deep understanding of the meaning of it, most people know the formula, and a fairly decent number have a basic understanding of what the formula means. Simply put, E is energy, m is mass, and c2 is the speed of light squared. And the entire formula can, in one way, be described as saying "Energy cannot be created or destoryed, merely changed in form".

One might wonder what any of this has to do with Social Constructs... well, it all arises from a thought I had. Just like the E (energy) in Einstein's equation, P (for Power ie: political or governmental power) cannot be creatred or destroyed, merely changed in form or redistributed.

Taking that as true, one could try to determine some form of equation to desribe this... I like to think of it so: P=G$ or to put it in easier to understand terms... Power equals Government (or control) multiplied by Wealth (or ecomonic power). Assuming this is a valid equation, one becomes aware that it operates exactly as Einstein's famous equation... any decrease in G (or governmental control) must cause a corresponding increase in $ (or economic power).

But, I hear someone ask, what does that mean?

It's really very simple... but let's look at some other "equations" to describe what G and $ are... G (or governmental control) could possibly be expressed as G=V(HR/B) where V is the voters HR is the honesty of their elected representatives, and B is beauracracy, so we see that the power of G (government) is dependant on the voters,multiplied by  the honesty of the elected officials they choose, but lessened by the power of unelected beauracrats.

And of course, $ (or economic power) well, we all know what that is and who holds it.

So what does this acttually mean? It's really quite simple, when you hear these "fiscal conservatives" claiming we need to "cut the size of government" what they are actually saying is, we need to take power away from the voters, and give it to the "money men"... remember, P(or power) is a constant, it cannot be created or destroyed... so lessening G (government) MUST cause a corresponding increase in $ (or economic power).

I don't know about you, I kind of like the idea that we can determine who leads us, and we can influence the laws and policies of our government by voting... and I cannot remember any time when I was asked to vote for the next CEO of Exxon, or vote for the Board of Directors of Goldman/Sachs...

Some might try to argue that the right wing does not actually propound such policies... but look at what they do... they want to privatize nearly every government program. They want huge tax breaks and loopholes for Corporations and the wealthy. They have even stated, in the guise of Grover Norquist that they wanted to "starve the government until it was small enough to drown in the bathtub"... that's what they want to do with the only thing that gives the average American any power at all... shrink it, starve it, and drown it in the bathtub... and I assume, spit on it's corpse when it's dead... that's what they think of the voters.
:iconfraterchaos:
just a little something I thought of last night while trying to fall asleep
Add a Comment:
 
love 0 0 joy 0 0 wow 0 0 mad 1 1 sad 0 0 fear 0 0 neutral 0 0
:iconwolfsorcerer:
*WolfSorcerer Mar 3, 2013  Hobbyist Digital Artist
Just visiting to keep track on the latest comments. Very much agree with most of what is being said here. We've been through all these already, detail by detail. Recovery is very slow and don't think Argentina will make it in the mid/long term. The internal vultures are as fierce as the foreign ones.
To make the picture simple, imagine if the civil war in the US would have been won by the Confederates. Well, the civil wars in Argentina during the 19th century were finally won by your equivalent to the South...
Reply
:iconfraterchaos:
*fraterchaos Mar 3, 2013  Hobbyist Digital Artist
yes, I know what you mean... right now, it seems as if the confederacy in the US is trying to make a comeback
Reply
:iconwolfsorcerer:
*WolfSorcerer Mar 5, 2013  Hobbyist Digital Artist
I think they already did my friend, only in a different disguise.
Reply
:iconfraterchaos:
*fraterchaos Mar 5, 2013  Hobbyist Digital Artist
true
Reply
:icongrahamsym:
*GrahamSym Feb 27, 2013   Digital Artist
"just a little something I thought of last night while trying to fall asleep" Man have you not tried counting sheep, takes less energy!
Sad to say this mirrors many nations. The UK and Europe are in exactly the same situation. We are all getting screwed by goverments and bankers.
The UK's goverment is full of ultra rich posh boys (Mummy and Daddy's money) who don't understand real life.
Reply
:iconfraterchaos:
*fraterchaos Feb 27, 2013  Hobbyist Digital Artist
oh I know... I think it's hilarious that the right wing in the USA keeps complaining that Obama is too European, while they advocate for the failed "Austerity" programs that clearly are not working in Europe!

As for counting sheep, I never really had any luck with that for falling asleep... lol
Reply
:icongrahamsym:
*GrahamSym Feb 27, 2013   Digital Artist
"Austerity" is definately not working in the UK. Its pretty desperate...
Reply
:iconfraterchaos:
*fraterchaos Feb 27, 2013  Hobbyist Digital Artist
I know... from everything I have seen, the countries that are still doing it are failing, and those that have abandoned it are improving, but here in the states the right wing keeps calling for more cuts and lower taxes on the wealthy, and then turning around and claiming it's not the same as "Europena Austerity" which is exactly what it is
Reply
:icongrahamsym:
Mood: Anger *GrahamSym Feb 27, 2013   Digital Artist
Right wing politicians always make cuts in public spending, they have the money and want to keep it. tax cuts for the top earners (Because apparently they will leave the country if we don't give it to them) meanwhile everyone else has to tighten their belts... I read that in the UK at any one time there is 500,000 jobs up for grabs, yet we have over 2.5 million people out of work. The UK gov, are sending disabled people back to work, increasing the age one can claim an old age pension to 70. Students do not get free university education anymore (It costs them £30.000 per annum) so now only the rich can afford a Uni education.
Apparently, according to our glorious rich posh boy leaders in the UK "we are all in it together"....
Reply
:iconfraterchaos:
*fraterchaos Feb 27, 2013  Hobbyist Digital Artist
oh yeah... well at least you HAD free college educations at one time, we never have and tutition has been going up and up recently, but what can you expect from a nation that has creationists on it's congressional science committee? Seriopusly, one of the guys who is on the science committee actually said that evolution and the big bang theory are "lies from the pit of hell"

I saw a thing a little while back... it was about the rich hiding money ion off shore banks that do not report the incomes and are therefore not taxed... while it is impossible to determine how much money anyone has in one of these accounts, it is perfectly possible to determine the total amount of money that is contained in ALL these accounts combined... If I remember right, it was something 250 trillion dollars (in US terms) That's more than enough money, that just the taxes that are not being paid would get every nation on earth out of debt...
Reply
Add a Comment: